For many federal employees and contractors, and certainly for members of the military, obtaining a security clearance is a perquisite to obtaining and maintaining a job, particularly with agencies like CIA, NSA, NRO, and NGA; and the Departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security, Justice, and Energy (among others, of course). No clearance; no job. Some positions require the additional requirement of “successfully completing a polygraph.” Navigating the clearance process can be daunting and downright frightening. Most of the time, there are no issues. But issues do arise.
We regularly represent clients who have had heir clearance denied, suspended, or revoked. The firm represents their interests in drafting a substantive response to the Statement of Reasons or Letter of Intent, as well as appear, as appropriate, before an Administrative Judge, Clearance Adjudication Facilities (CAFs), Offices of Security (OS), review boards, and administrative courts. Moreover, the firm provides expert guidance in preparing the SF-85 (public trust clearance) /SF-86 (security clearance) and pre-polygraph counseling.
Services include, but are not limited to:
- Expert advice in the SF-85 or SF-86 application process.
- Polygraph counseling.
- Includes, but is not limited to, correspondence challenging derogatory information contained within JPAS or Scattered Castles.
Formal Response to the Statement of Reasons (SOR) or Letter of Intent (LOI)
- Formal response to the Government’s recommendation to revoke a security clearance, which includes assembling all supporting evidence to be considered by the U.S. Government.
- The formal response includes a detailed and legally sound response based upon the clearance adjudication guidelines and tailored to mitigate the government’s concerns.
- Formal appeal to a decision to revoke a security clearance.
- Representation includes the preparation of appellate briefs and appearing before the board at a hearing. This often occurs before the relevant Department or Agency Appeals Boards, such as at the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA).
For employees who believe clearance actions have been taken in retaliation/reprisal because they made a protected disclosure (whistleblowing), please see our page on Whistleblower Representation.